ABSTRACT
Objective
To evaluate the predictive ability of indices based on the combination of C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin, namely the CRP/albumin ratio (CAR), Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), and modified GPS (mGPS), for prolonged hospital stay in patients with acute pancreatitis.
Methods
This prospective observational study was conducted on patients monitored in the emergency department of a tertiary university hospital. The patients’ demographic data, vital signs, laboratory parameters, comorbidities, and length of hospital stay were prospectively recorded. Based on their length of hospital stay, the patients were divided into two groups: prolonged stay (>7 days) and non-prolonged stay. The indices were compared between these groups.
Results
There were statistically significant differences in CAR, GPS, and mGPS between the prolonged and non-prolonged hospital stay groups (p<0.001 for all; chi-square test). The area under the curve values of CAR, GPS, and mGPS were calculated as 0.677 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.601-0.753, p<0.001], 0.637 (95% CI: 0.570-0.704, p<0.001), and 0.671 (95% CI: 0.602-0.740, p<0.001), respectively. According to multivariate analysis, CAR [odds ratio (OR)=1.017, 95% CI (1.003-1.03), p=0.015], GPS [OR=2.894, 95% CI (1.632-5.13), p<0.001], and mGPS [OR=3.757, 95% CI (2.108-6.70), p<0.001] were found to be independent predictors of prolonged hospital stay.
Conclusions
CAR, GPS, and mGPS are independent predictors of prolonged hospital stay in patients with acute pancreatitis. The findings also suggest that incorporating CRP levels into prognostic calculations may yield more accurate results compared to scores based solely on albumin levels.
INTRODUCTION
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is among the most common gastrointestinal emergencies requiring hospitalization worldwide and represents a significant public health concern due to its high morbidity and mortality rates. While mild forms often resolve spontaneously, severe cases can lead to serious complications such as multiple organ failure and necrotizing pancreatitis, necessitating intensive care1, 2. The severity of AP can prolong hospital stays, increase treatment costs, and cause productivity loss, particularly among individuals of working age. These outcomes have serious implications not only for individual health but also for healthcare systems and economic burden3-5.
One of the main challenges in managing AP is predicting which patients will develop severe disease during its early stages. Mortality rates can reach up to 20% in severe AP cases and may exceed 50% in those with sepsis and multiple organ failure2, 4, 6, 7. Therefore, early identification of high-risk patients through reliable prognostic biomarkers is of critical importance for establishing appropriate treatment strategies and optimizing patient management8, 9. Various biomarkers have been investigated to predict the course and prognosis of the disease, with the most frequently studied parameters being C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin10, 11.
CRP is an acute-phase reactant synthesized by hepatocytes that plays a crucial role in systemic inflammatory responses12-16. In patients with AP, CRP levels have been shown to correlate with disease severity, and elevated CRP levels have been particularly associated with complications such as necrotizing pancreatitis, infection, and organ failure. CRP is considered a reliable biomarker for assessing disease severity, especially after the first 48 hours. However, it has also been demonstrated that CRP levels alone may have limited prognostic power and may not be sufficient for precise early-stage prediction17. Albumin, on the other hand, is a plasma protein reflecting inflammation and nutritional status, and its reduced levels have been associated with poor prognosis in critical illnesses and inflammatory states18-21. In patients with AP, hypoalbuminemia has been linked to enhanced inflammatory response, fluid imbalance, and poor clinical outcomes. Low albumin levels have been shown to increase the risk of mortality and complications, particularly in severe AP cases20, 21.
In recent years, growing attention has been given to the prognostic value of combining different biomarkers, leading to the development of new indices by evaluating CRP and albumin together11, 19. The CRP/albumin ratio (CAR), Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), and modified GPS (mGPS) have been reported as important prognostic indicators in various inflammatory and critical illnesses22-24. However, there is still a lack of literature regarding the clinical relevance of these indices in AP.
This study aimed to evaluate the predictive ability of indices based on the combination of CRP and albumin, namely CAR, GPS, and mGPS, for prolonged hospital stay in patients with AP.
MATERIALS and METHODS
Study Population
This prospective observational study was conducted between February 1, 2023, and July 1, 2023, on patients monitored in the Emergency Department of Health Sciences University Türkiye Umraniye Training and Research Hospital Scientific Research Ethics Committee (approval number: B.10.1.TKH.4.34.H.GP.0.01/135, date: 10.04.2025). Patients diagnosed with AP who were hospitalized and aged over 18 years were included in the study. The diagnosis of AP was based on at least two of the following three criteria: (1) characteristic abdominal pain; (2) serum amylase and/or lipase level greater than three times the upper limit of normal; and (3) imaging findings consistent with AP on ultrasound or contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Patients with missing data (albumin or CRP) were excluded. Patients with chronic pancreatitis, active malignancy, or concomitant severe sepsis were also excluded.
The patients’ demographic data (age and sex), vital signs (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation), laboratory parameters (complete blood count, CRP, albumin, liver and renal function tests, electrolyte levels, and blood gas values), comorbidities, intensive care requirements, and length of hospital stay were prospectively recorded. To assess the inflammatory response, CAR, GPS, and mGPS were calculated (Table 1). The patients were divided into two groups based on length of hospital stay: prolonged stay (>7 days) and non-prolonged stay (≤7 days).
In line with previous literature indicating this threshold as clinically meaningful in predicting complication risk and healthcare utilization in AP, ≥7 days was defined as prolonged5, 8
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using Jamovi software (v. 2.3.21). The normality of distribution for continuous variables was evaluated using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Non-normally distributed data were presented as median and interquartile range (IQR), and comparisons between groups were made using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages, and the chi-square test was used for comparisons. To determine the predictive ability of prognostic scores for prolonged hospital stay, receiver operating characteristic analyses were conducted, and the area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated. Differences between AUC values were evaluated using the DeLong test. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of prolonged hospital stay. Separate models were created for CAR, GPS, mGPS, and CRP to avoid the effect of collinearity. Model fit measures, including deviance, Akaike Information Criterion, and Nagelkerke’s R², were also reported. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
A total of 152 patients were included in the study. The median age was 58 years, with an IQR of 39 to 74 years. In terms of sex distribution, 61 patients (40%) were female, and 91 patients (60%) were male.
Descriptive data pertaining to the study are presented in Table 2. Based on the duration of hospitalization, the patients were divided into two groups. Of the total 152 patients included in the study, 111 (73%) were classified under the prolonged hospital stay group, while 41 (27%) were categorized under the non-prolonged hospital stay group. The overall median length of hospital stay was 14 days (IQR: 7-23 days) in the whole sample, 19 days (IQR: 13-25 days) in the prolonged stay group, and 4 days (IQR: 3-7 days) in the non-prolonged stay group.
The median diastolic blood pressure was 82 mmHg (IQR: 66-93 mmHg) for all patients in the sample, 78 mmHg (IQR: 64-89 mmHg) in the prolonged stay group, and 85 mmHg (IQR: 74-95 mmHg) in the non-prolonged stay group. This difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p=0.029). The median CRP level was identified as 42 mg/L (IQR: 13-124 mg/L) for all patients. The median CRP level was 61 mg/L (IQR: 22-134 mg/L) in the prolonged stay group and 17 mg/L (IQR: 5-48 mg/L) in the non-prolonged stay group, also indicating a statistically significant difference (p<0.001). CAR, GPS, and mGPS demonstrated statistically significant differences between the two groups (p<0.001 for all; chi-square test). This table presents the comparisons of other parameters between the groups.
The AUC of mGPS in terms of discriminatory performance was measured as 0.671 (95% CI: 0.602-0.740, p<0.001). GPS demonstrated an AUC value of 0.637 (95% CI: 0.570-0.704, p<0.001). CAR exhibited the highest performance among the tested models, with an AUC of 0.677 (95% CI: 0.601-0.753, p<0.001) (Figure 1). Other diagnostic accuracy metrics are shown in Table 3, with the significance of the differences between AUC values given in Table 4.
The multivariate analysis, evaluating whether each parameter, is an independent predictor for prolonged hospital stay, is presented in Table 5.
DISCUSSION
In this prospective study, we evaluated the prognostic value of inflammation-based biomarkers-specifically the CAR, GPS, and mGPS-in predicting prolonged hospital stay among patients diagnosed with AP. Our findings demonstrated that all three parameters were significantly associated with extended hospitalization, with CAR emerging as the most diagnostically accurate tool.
AP is a condition with a highly variable clinical trajectory. While most cases are self-limiting, a subset of patients progresses to severe disease requiring prolonged hospitalization and intensive support. Early risk stratification remains a cornerstone for guiding appropriate clinical management and resource allocation1-5. In this regard, systemic inflammation plays a pivotal role in disease progression and complications. Scoring systems such as GPS and mGPS, which integrate inflammatory markers, have previously been applied in oncology and infectious diseases23-25. Our results support their broader applicability in inflammatory diseases such as AP.
Among the evaluated scores, CAR demonstrated the strongest association with prolonged length of stay and remained an independent predictor in multivariate logistic regression analysis [odds ratio (OR): 1.017, p=0.015]. This underscores the additive prognostic value of combining CRP, a marker of acute phase response, with albumin, a marker of nutritional and inflammatory status12, 19. Importantly, CAR offers a simple, cost-effective, and rapidly accessible tool for early risk evaluation, especially valuable features in settings with limited resources or delayed access to imaging.
When comparing GPS and mGPS, our study found that mGPS had significantly superior diagnostic performance, as supported by the DeLong test (p<0.001). This finding suggests that including CRP levels in risk stratification provides enhanced prognostic accuracy compared to albumin-only models. These observations are in line with prior research. For example, Wang et al.26 demonstrated that GPS predicted 28-day mortality in severe AP patients, in the ICU, and Bardakçı et al.27 reported that mGPS outperformed traditional scores such as Ranson and APACHE II in identifying severe cases25. Our study extends these findings by focusing on length of hospital stay as a functional outcome, which is closely tied to disease severity and resource burden.
CAR has also been studied in AP mortality prediction. Kaplan et al.28 found that CAR values >16.28 were associated with a 19-fold increase in mortality risk, while Zhao et al.29 reported its association with organ failure and necrosis. In alignment with those studies, our results suggest that CAR is also a reliable predictor of disease severity as reflected by hospitalization length.
From a clinical perspective, inflammation-based biomarkers like CAR, GPS, and mGPS provide practical, low-cost alternatives to complex scoring systems such as APACHE II or Ranson. They allow early triage and may facilitate timely decision-making, especially in high-volume emergency departments or low-resource healthcare environments.
Study Limitations
This study has several limitations. First, it was conducted at a single center, which may restrict the generalizability of the findings. Second, long-term outcomes such as readmission, recurrence, or late complications were not assessed. Third, although laboratory markers were evaluated, integration with radiological and detailed clinical scoring systems (e.g., CTSI) was not performed. Future multicenter studies incorporating longitudinal outcomes and multimodal prognostic approaches are needed to validate and expand upon these results.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, this study demonstrated that CAR, GPS, and mGPS are independent predictors of prolonged hospital stay in patients with AP. Among them, CAR showed the highest diagnostic performance. The inclusion of CRP in inflammation-based prognostic scores appears to enhance predictive accuracy, supporting the use of mGPS over GPS in this clinical context. Given their simplicity and accessibility, these biomarkers may aid in early risk stratification and decision-making. Nevertheless, further validation through multicenter, prospective studies is warranted before these scores can be routinely adopted into clinical algorithms.


