Response to the Letter to the Editor Regarding Our Research Article on “Effect of Different Doses of Sugammadex on Recovery and Hemodynamic Parameters in Reversing Neuromuscular Blockade in Patients Undergoing Electroconvulsive Therapy”
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Letter to the Editor
VOLUME: 40 ISSUE: 1
P: 35 - 36
March 2025

Response to the Letter to the Editor Regarding Our Research Article on “Effect of Different Doses of Sugammadex on Recovery and Hemodynamic Parameters in Reversing Neuromuscular Blockade in Patients Undergoing Electroconvulsive Therapy”

Medeni Med J 2025;40(1):35-36
1. University of Health Sciences Türkiye Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Istanbul, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 09.02.2025
Accepted Date: 11.02.2025
Online Date: 28.03.2025
Publish Date: 28.03.2025
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Dear Editor,

We want to thank our readers for their interest in our research article on the recovery and hemodynamic parameters of different sugammadex doses (2 mg/kg and 3 mg/kg) in patients undergoing electroconvulsive therapy (ECT)1. The answers to the questions asked about our article are provided below.

First, sugammadex has made a breakthrough in the rapid and safe reversal of neuromuscular blockade. However, it is more costly than cholinesterase inhibitors used to reverse neuromuscular blockade. The effects of high doses of sugammadex, such as 8 mg/kg and 16 mg/kg, on recovery in ECT procedures have been investigated in the literature2, 3. In our study, both 2 mg/kg and 3 mg/kg doses were effective and safe. In addition, it was determined that the 3 mg/kg dose provided faster recovery compared to the 2 mg/kg dose. As you stated, determining cost-effectiveness requires various evaluations, including drug cost, total hospital stay, and complications, but this is not the purpose of our study. No significant complications were observed in the patients included in the study other than hemodynamic changes that could be resolved with short-term interventions. In conclusion, as demonstrated in our study, low sugammadex doses are low-cost and safe in the recovery from anesthesia, however, comprehensive studies are needed regarding cost-effectiveness.

Secondly, we observed that approximately one in three patients in our study had bipolar disorder, one in three had major depression and depressive disorders, and one in three had psychosis, schizophrenia, and schizoaffective disorders. As you rightly pointed out, the recovery may vary depending on the diagnosis, and the drugs used in treatment. In our hospital practice, we did not find significant differences in recovery among patients with different diagnoses when using low-dose propofol-rocuronium for induction and 2-3 mg/kg sugammadex for reversal. However, we agree that further studies are necessary to fully understand this complex relationship.

We appreciate your interest in our research.

Keywords:
Electroconvulsive therapy, neuromuscular blocking agents, rocuronium, sugammadex, anesthesia recovery

Ethics

Author Contributions

Concept: K.A., A.S.S., Design: K.A., A.S.S., Literature Search: K.A., A.S.S., Writing: K.A.
Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

1
Arslan K, Kucuksarac G, Cetin Arslan H, Aydin E, Sahin AS. Effect of different doses of sugammadex on recovery and hemodynamic parameters in reversing neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing electroconvulsive therapy. Medeni Med J. 2024;39:16-23.
2
Karahan MA, Büyükfırat E, Binici O, et al. The the effects of rocuronium-sugammadex on fetomaternal outcomes in pregnancy undergoing electroconvulsive therapy: a retrospective case series and literature review. Cureus. 2019;11:e4820.
3
Kadoi Y, Hoshi H, Nishida A, Saito S. Comparison of recovery times from rocuronium-induced muscle relaxation after reversal with three different doses of sugammadex and succinylcholine during electroconvulsive therapy. J Anesth. 2011;25:855-859.